Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have been in a legal battle for more than 10 years. Once Hollywood’s favorite couple, Pitt and Jolie had surprised the world after announcing their split. Since then, the two of them have been in legal disagreement related to many aspects of their amicable divorce. As per recent reports, however, the two stars are all ready to call it quits with the legal shenanigans. The two have allegedly chosen to call a truce to all of the legal matters that have been going on for the past few years.
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are calling a truce on their long legal battle
On February 17, as per a report that had been shared by Closer Online, the former celebrity couple is looking towards bringing the legal drama to an end by 2026. A statement from the same report read, “Ten years of fighting is long enough. Both sides have made their points. This has to stop in the next twelve months. It’s time to find a compromise. No matter how uncomfortable that may be in the short term.”While internally the two may be planning to call a truce, the legal court proceedings for their case is still ongoing. In December last year, the court ruled in the ‘F1’ actor’s favor. The court order stated that Jolie had to reveal unfiltered documents and messages related to Miraval. An appeal was filed by the actress’s legal team; the deadlines set by the court persist.
More about Miraval, the couple’s shared vineyard
Miraval has been at the forefront of its legal disputes over the past couple of years. While their divorce itself was finalized after almost 8 years, the two are still fighting in court over Miraval. The two had bought the garaceful vineyard together after they celebrated their marriage anniversary there in 2014. When they parted ways, Jolie sold off her stakes in the vineyard to another company.However, Pitt contested the decision and cited that the sale occurred without his knowledge and permission.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing as reported by a third-party source. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, and a final verdict has not been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.
