For many travellers, securing a US visa has long been a hurdle. One of the things that can easily derail anyone’s most carefully laid travel plans. In recent years, shifting policies, tighter scrutiny, and evolving interview standards have only heightened the uncertainty. Applicants often walk into consulates with all their required documents, confirmed tickets, and whatever necessary, only to walk out rejected minutes later.That’s exactly what happened to a young Indian couple who had secured tickets to the FIFA World Cup and applied for a B1/B2 visitor visa, hoping to combine football fever with a short American holiday. Instead, their application was denied under Section 214(b), leaving them confused about what went wrong.So this traveller shared on Reddit that he thought he had a solid case for a US tourist visa. He shared that he and his wife were planning to watch the FIFA World Cup, for which they applied for a B1/B2 visa under what he described as a “FIFA Pass” category, hoping to travel to the United States to watch the tournament.
Canva
Instead, their application was refused under Section 214(b). This section as per the US Department of State means, the applicant did not sufficiently demonstrate to the consular officer that they qualified for the nonimmigrant visa category they applied for, and/or failed to overcome the legal presumption of immigrant intent. Under US law, every visitor visa applicant is presumed to be an intending immigrant unless they can prove strong ties to their home country, such as employment, business, family, or financial commitments — that would compel them to return after their temporary stay. (Applicants under H-1B and L visa categories, along with their spouses and minor children, are exempt from this presumption requirement.
US Department of State
The applicant later shared details of the interview on Reddit, asking fellow users why he might have been rejected.According to his account, the visa interaction was brief.He greeted the interviewer and introduced himself and his wife. When asked about the purpose of the visit, he responded: “Our purpose is to watch the FIFA World Cup since we have been allocated FIFA pass by the US authorities and in addition to that we might visit New York.”Read more: 10 of the world’s most expensive cities for luxury living right nowThe officer then asked about his annual salary. He replied that he earns INR 25 lakh per annum. Asked whether he had previously applied for a US visa, he said this was his first time. When questioned about international travel history, he said he had visited Oman and no other country.Shortly after, the officer handed him a 214(b) refusal slip and informed him that he was “not eligible for this time.” The applicant noted that the officer did not ask his wife any questions.Section 214(b) refusals are issued when a consular officer determines that an applicant has not sufficiently demonstrated non-immigrant intent, in other words, that they intend to return home after their temporary stay in the US. Under US law, every visitor visa applicant is presumed to be an intending immigrant unless they can prove otherwise.Read more: Bengaluru gets cherry blossom vibes as Pink Poui blooms across the city; best places to visitIn the Reddit thread, several commenters suggested that the applicant’s phrasing may have weakened his case.One user pointed out the use of uncertain language: “Never use ambiguous statements like ‘maybe’ or ‘might’,” they wrote. “Always share confirmed plans: ‘I am going to watch the game on X date in Boston, and then we will stay two days in New York.’”Another commenter said they had witnessed a rejection “just for sharing tentative plans.”One user cautioned against presenting overly confirmed bookings, noting that the US government’s visa website clearly states that applicants do not need to purchase flights or make hotel reservations before obtaining a visa. In fact, pre-paid arrangements could be viewed as suspicious.
“Have a clear plan. Do not have a confirmed plan,” the commenter advised, suggesting applicants describe a structured but flexible itinerary, such as watching a match, spending a few days sightseeing, and then returning home for work commitments.Travel history also emerged as a possible factor. With only one prior international trip — to Oman — the applicant may have had limited travel credentials to demonstrate a pattern of returning home after foreign visits.While the managing director stated that he runs a company and earns a stable income, US consular decisions are discretionary and based on the overall profile presented during the short interview, often lasting just a few minutes.For now, the couple’s World Cup plans remain uncertain. Under 214(b), applicants can reapply, but they must demonstrate stronger evidence of ties to their home country or address any weaknesses from the previous application.
