Sabrina Carpenter, the virtuous singer who continues to shine on and off the stage, has been granted a temporary restraining order against a 31-year-old man who had an alarming approach. Identified as William Applegate, the man tried to force his way into her Los Angeles house in the last month and returned twice. Here’s a closer look at Sabrina Carpenter and her restraining order against her stalker.
Sabrina Carpenter expresses her distress after a stalker tried to enter her house
Fearing for personal safety, Carpenter wrote in her declaration that the man had a pattern of stalking, trespassing, and surveillance, causing her emotional distress. When confronted by security, the alleged stalker refused to leave, citing that he knew the ‘Manchild’ singer and that she was expecting him, according to the BBC. In recent weeks, the intruder visited her house uninvited and tried to break in.Mentioning an alarming incident in her court documents that happened on May 23, Carpenter reported that he was at her front door after coming through the neighbour’s house, rang the bell, and refused to move away from the residence until the police authorities arrived. “[He] fabricated the outrageous and entirely false claim that he personally knew me and that I was expecting him. This was a complete lie,” the ‘Sugar Talking’ singer penned. In less than 24 hours, he visited her house again and loitered outside. The next day, he parked in front of her house.
Sabrina Carpenter’s stalker court visit
Carpenter submitted the surveillance footage from her doorbell camera and asked for protection for her and two close ones who live with her: her sister and her sister’s boyfriend. The judge has granted a temporary restraining order, directing the man to be 100 meters away from Sabrina, her house, her car, and her workplace, including the other residents. The next court hearing will be on June 17, 2026, as the man is due in the criminal court after he was arrested for trespassing.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing as reported by a third-party source. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, and a final verdict has not been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.
